Monday, November 18, 2013

PARTICIPATION OF YAZID IN THE WAR OF QUSTUNTUNIA (CAESAR'S CITY) IN THE LIGHT OF ISLAMIC HISTORY

PARTICIPATION OF YAZID IN THE WAR OF QUSTUNTUNIA (CAESAR'S CITY)
IN THE LIGHT OF ISLAMIC HISTORY
By Dr.Faizan Ahmed Azizi
Narrated Khalid bin Madan:
That 'Umair bin Al-Aswad Al-Anasi told him that he went to 'Ubada bin As-Samit while he was staying in his house at the seashore of Hims with (his wife) Um Haram. 'Umair said. Um Haram informed us that she heard the Prophet saying, "Paradise is granted to the first batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition." Um Haram added, I said, 'O Allah's Apostle! Will I be amongst them?' He replied, 'You are amongst them.' The Prophet then said, 'the first army amongst' my followers who will invade Caesar's City will be forgiven their sins.' I asked, 'Will I be one of them, O Allah's Apostle?' He replied in the negative."( Sahih al Bukhari, Book of Jihad Volume 4, Book 52, and Number 175)

From the above hadith some people from Muslim trying to misguide the muslims. They says Yazid was participated in the war of Caesar’s and due to his participation he was Jannati because Holy prophet (Sallallahu alaihe wasallam) said my followers who will invade Caesar's City will be forgiven their sins. This claim is fabricated and totally wrong. Because in the Hadith two thing are clearly mentioned.
1.)        First batch of my followers who will undertake a naval expedition.
2.)        The first army amongst' my followers who will invade Caesar's City.
The prediction of Holy prophet (Sallallahu alaihe wasallam ) said in both attached first batch will get Paradise and forgiven their sin. If we look into the history we will find that yazid was not o participated in both attach he was participated in 8th batch second group. Let see what history said.
First Naval War and Yazid participation:
The first naval expedition is done by Hazrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah be well pleased with him). In the chilapath of Hazrat Usman ibn Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah be well pleased with him) seek permission to attack on Rome he got permission and in Hijri 32 he attached and fought battles after battles till he reached the city of Constantinople. Yazid was not participated in that battle he  was a kid and  6 years old that time. (Tarikh Kamil, Vol 3, Pg No. 25 &Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 7, Pg No. 179)
Attack on Caesar's City and Yazid participation:
Let’s see the history is Yazid participated in first army or not who attack on Caesar’s city.
First Attack
First Muslim Army which attacked Caesar's city was sent by Holy prophet (Sallallahu alaihe wasallam) himself, According to later Muslim historians, Holy prophet (Sallallahu alaihe wasallam) dispatched 3,000 of his troops to the area in Jumada al-awwal of the year 8 A.H., i.e., A.D. 629, for a quick expedition to attack and punish the tribes. The army was led by Zayd ibn Haritha; the second-in-command was Jafar ibn Abi Talib and the third-in-command was Abdullah ibn Rawahah.( Saif-ur-Rahman Mubarakpuri, ar-Raheeq al-Makhtoom, "The Sealed Nectar", Islamic University of Medina, Dar-us-Salam publishers ISBN 1-59144-071-8) Holy prophet (Sallallahu alaihe wasallam)had already given the prediction of Shahadat (martyrdom) of Jaffar Taiyyar, Zaid bin Harith and Abdullah before that news came to Madina. This battle called “The Battle of Mu'tah”In that time yazid was not only participated even he was not born at battle.
Here is the Link to Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Mu%27tah)about this first Islamic War of Mautta upon Caesar's City.
Second Attack
If we take the meaning of Capital of Caesar's City, then it was the city of “Hims  " (also spelled Homs) which was also conquered during the times of Umar Ibn al-Khattab in 16th Hijri (Islamic year).The commander of this Army was Abu 'Ubaidah, and the Companion Yazid bin Abu Sufyan was included in it. Even that time yazid was not born. He was born in 26 Hijri, (Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 9, Pg No. 76)
Third Attack
Hazrat Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah be well pleased with him) attacked Rome in Hijri 32 and fought battles after battles till he reached the city of Constantinople.Yazid   was a kid of 6 years. (Tarikh Kamil, Vol 3, Pg No. 25 &Bidayah wan Nihayah, Vol 7, Pg No. 179) (This was first naval Attack on Rome)
Fourth Attack
In 42 A.H the Muslims attacked Rome their way to Constantinople.  ( Bidayah wan Nihayah Vol 8, Pg No 24)
Fifth Attack
In 43 A.H the Muslims attacked Rome under the leadership of Hadhrat Basar bin Artaah (May Allah be well pleased with him) and fought their way to Constantinople.  (Tarikh Ibn Khaldun, Vol 3, Pg No.9 & Bidayah wan Nihayah Vol 8, Pg No 24)
Sixth Attack
In 44 Hijri Muslims, with Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with them) entered Rome and spent winter there only and Hadhrat Basar bin Artaah (May Allah be well pleased with him) fought through the sea. Tarikh Kamil, Vol 3, Pg no. 298
Seventh Attack
Incidents of 46 Hijri Hadhrat Malik bin Abdullah (May Allah be well pleased with him) remained in the kingdom of Rome and it has been said that Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with them) and returned to Hims the same year and passed away into the presence of Allah."he commander of this army to attack to Constantinople was Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with them).  This attack has been mentioned not only in the books of history, but also in Sunan Abu Dawood, which is a reliable book from the Sihah Sittah (the 6 most authentic and reliable books of Hadith).  It is given in Sunan Abu Dawood, Vol 1, Kitabul Jihad, Pg No. 340 (Hadith No: 2151), "Muslims attacked Constantinople and in this battle, Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with him) was the commander.
Translation: It has been narrated on the authority of Hadhrat Abu Imran (May Allah be well pleased with him): We left Madina with the intention of attacking Constantinople.  The commander of the army was Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with him).  The Romans had their backs to the ramparts.  A person readied himself for attack.  The people said: La ilaha illallah, he is taking himself to death. Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah be well pleased with him) said: This verse has been revealed about us, when Allah  helped the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) and made Islam dominant, then we said, 'Come let us remain with our property and wealth and set them right,' then Allah  sent this command: And spend in the way of Allah  and do not put yourself in mortal danger.รข€ Surah Baqra- 195 and so to take oneself to death is to remain with our property, busy oneself in setting them right and abandon Jihad.  Hadhrat Abu Imran says that Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah be well pleased with him) used to perform Jihad for the sake of Allah , to the extent that he was buried in Constantinople."
According to the above mentioned details, the army, which attacked Constantinople under Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah be well pleased with him) in 32 Hijri is the first army and this is the army, which according to Sahih Bukhari, is forgiven. It is made clear by the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood, that the commander of the army, which attacked Constantinople was Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with them), who passed away in either 46 or 47 A.H, as given in Tarikh Kamil in the incidents of 46 Hijri
Sunan Abu Dawood is from among the Sihah Sittah (the six most authentic books of Hadith).  It is by all standards more preferable than the books of history.  This proves beyond doubt that under the leadership of Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with them) Constantinople was attacked before 46 or 47 Hijri, as the canons of history and Rijal establish that Hadhrat Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with them) passed away in 46 or 47 Hijri.
Eight Attack
A group of Muslim Attacked on room with a person name Hazrat Yazid bin Shazra shami not Yazid ibn Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah be well pleased with him).
Ninth Attack
In 49 Hijri or 50 H, Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah be well pleased with him) made preparations to take the towns and cities of Rome under Sufyan bin Auf. That time in first group yazid was not participated he send as a punishment in the war by force fully later with second group. In Tareekh Kamil this incidence mentioned as
“In this year (49 Hijri) and some says 50 H, Mu’awiyah made preparations to take the towns and cities of Rome under Sufyan bin Auf. He sent out the army and ordered his son Yazeed to join him but Yazeed was lax in this regard, Mu’awiya therefore became silent on the matter. The army during the conquered suffered from sickness and hunger and upon receipt of this news, Yazeed recited a couplet: Why shall I care about what the army facing in Farqadona from fever and smallpox While I lay comfort in deluxe clothes at the house of Marwan with Um Kulthom”.
Um Kulthoom bint Abdullah Ibn Aamir was Yazeed’s wife. When Muawiyah heard the couplets of Yazeed, he vowed to send him to Rome to Sufiyan bin Auf so that he also confronts hardship”

We read in Muruj al Dhahab:“Mu’awiya received information on the progress of the army and conveyed this news to Yazeed who said, “In this case I shall convene a function in home, joined by my fellow drunkards”.

By citing these references, it has become clear that:
1. The prediction of Holy prophet (Sallallahu alaihe wasallam ) said in both attached first batch    
     will get  paradise and forgiven their sin . Yazid was participated in Ninth Bath.

2. Unlike the propaganda of misleaded people, it was Hazrat Sufyan bin Auf who was the
   commander of the army that went to Caesar’s City and not Yazeed.

3. Yazeed had no interest in participating in the Jihad and thus didn’t go with the army which
   clearly excludes him from the first army promised forgiveness in the alleged hadith.

4. On hearing the hardships the army confronted there, Yazeed became pleased at his decision
   of not going which is not a sign of a person worthy enough to have a glance at Paradise let
   alone enter it.

5. On hearing Yazeed’s satisfaction, Ameer Mu'awiyah (May Allah be well pleased with him)
    decided to send him as a punishment.

21 comments:

  1. sahi faramaya usse saza ke your pe bheja gaya tha .........pahli lashkar jannati hai jisne qustun tuniya me hamla kiya

    ReplyDelete
  2. yazeed jannati nahi hai ........ ye night lashkar me saza ke tour pe abu maviyah r.a bheje the

    ReplyDelete
  3. Yazeed Jannati hai Dajjal ki jannat ka jannati

    ReplyDelete
  4. a good research indeed. I came to know it through some writings of Allama Prof. Tahirul Qadri.

    I request you to rectify some grammatical errors in the write up.
    Thnks
    -Muhammad Naved Ashrafi, India

    ReplyDelete
  5. very very thanx to you for this.very informatic!!!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for your well-defined clear information which clears the confusion on this subjects which was used by many to mislead others and for misinformation. Thanks

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ye koi pagal hai start Hadith se kiya end apne daleel se kiya

    ReplyDelete
  8. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Correction: it was sixth battle in which yazeed khabees took part. Also the leader name was sufyan bin affan not sufyan bin auf. Rest seems good.

    ReplyDelete
  10. https://uploadfiles.io/f/jj74o

    Please also read the attached book for reference and other points of view.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Ye hadeeth Na to yazeed paar fit hoti hai na Usse walid sahab paar. Is hadeeth ke aur bhi turk Moujood hai Bukhari mein , jis mein kahain nahi maghfirat ka zikar hai. Ik hi turk mein zikr hai , jis mein Thouri bin Yazeed ravi Moujood hai. Us ke baare mein jarah hai ki wo Ali RA ka dushman tha.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I want a qusation kia 79 sa ziad sahabi Rasool na yazeed ka haat per baet ki thi?ager ki thee tu sahabi aik shRabi zani ka hAt per beat kar sakta hi?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Pehlay tho yeh clear hona chahiay keh karbala ka waqia hua bhi hay ya nahi... 60, 61 Hijri main honey wala waqia 300 saal bad tareeq main pehli bar 350 Hijra main Imam tabri sahib nay pehli dafa tehreer kia... or is andaz say likha keh shaid kisi nay pori film banai ho or wo likh raha ho... Phir dosri baat... jab Hussaini Qafila Junoob say Shumaal ki taraf Kofa ja raha tha... tho wo Kofa say 100 km agay (Karbala) kesy pahunch gaya? pehlay yah clear ho phir agay koi baat hogi...

      Delete
    2. Kuch khouf e khuda kro. Ahadees se sabit hai is waqya k bare khud jibrael as ne nabi pak ko btaya tha. How could you deny this kuch shrm honi chahye nawasa e rasool se zyada pyara hai tmhe yazeed lanati. Pehle sb prho phr baat kro sb se bare gwah janab zain ul abideen hai is waqaya k. Bibi sakina ki qabar etc. Dunya me majood hai un ki nishania bs tmhare yazeed ka koi nishan nai

      Delete
    3. Pehli bat yeh hain k yahan par tareekh ki bath ho rahi hai.. Mery liye sary Rasool or us ka sahaba or jitny logo nay bhi Islam ki sar-bulandi k liye koshishain ki hai .. qaibil e ikhtiram hain... Mery comments ka maqsa sirf or sirf tareekh par tanqeed hai... Jitni bhi riwayat ya ahadees hai.. wo sub Muhammad (PBUP) k 250 saal bad likhi gai hai.. in Muhaddiseen may koi bhi Arab nahi tha.. bilky sary Irani thay... Sewaye Imam Malik ky.... Masla Yeh hai.. keh sunniyo ki apni kahaniyan hai or Ahl Tashi ki apni... ab kon sahi??? yeh sawal jis say bi kiya jata hai.. tho wo apny maslak or gourp ko depend karny ajata hai... Islam mi koi firqa .. koi goup.. koi maslak ya hoi jumat nahi hai.. or Deen Islam aik wahdat par qaim tha.. or Quran is bath ka gawah hai... Isliye zarori hai.. keh us sazish ka pata lagaya jaye.. jis nay musalmano ko firqo or maslako may taqseem kia... Allah sub ko sedhi rah par chalany ki taufeeq ata farmain.

      Delete